Best viewer quotes:
BamBam665: how very quickly the tables can turn...
old_macdonald: damn... some of the hookers on this show are now
even older than me...
abynormal: CyberCaz is our Time Lord, keeping the past a live for
AmyPie: young dumb full of cum
Sal_Ami: I'd rather read a book or stare at the wall than pay to
nickolai: Good comedy relieves stress.
sirzer: enjoying this channel.. thanks! good comfort shows
Sign up/in and REQUEST in CHAT!!! requests can override...
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976,
allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism,
comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and
Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might
otherwise be infringing.
Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor
of fair use.
Fair use is a doctrine in the United States copyright law that
allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring
permission from the rights holders, such as for commentary,
criticism, news reporting, research, teaching or scholarship. It
provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of
copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor
balancing test. The term “fair use” originated in the United
States. A similar principle, fair dealing, exists in some other
common law jurisdictions. Civil law jurisdictions have other
limitations and exceptions to copyright.
One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right
to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies
or phonorecords. This right is subject to certain limitations found
in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (title 17, U.S.
Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of
“fair use”. The doctrine of fair use has developed through a
substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been
codified in section 107 of the copyright law.
Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the
reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as
criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and
research. Section 107 also sets out in four factors to be
considered in determining whether or not a particular use is
1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use
is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational
2. The nature of the copyrighted work
3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to
the copyrighted work as a whole
4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value
of, the copyrighted work
The distinction between fair use and infringement may be unclear
and not easily defined. There is no specific number of words,
lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission.
Acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not
substitute for obtaining permission.
The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General
Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law cites examples of activities
that courts have regarded as fair use: “quotation of excerpts in a
review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment;
quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for
illustration or clarification of the author’s observations; use in
a parody of some of the content of the work parodied; summary of an
address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report;
reproduction by a library of a portion of a work to replace part of
a damaged copy; reproduction by a teacher or student of a small
part of a work to illustrate a lesson; reproduction of a work in
legislative or judicial proceedings or reports; incidental and
fortuitous reproduction, in a newsreel or broadcast, of a work
located in the scene of an event being reported.”
Copyright protects the particular way an author has expressed
himself. It does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual
information conveyed in the work.
The safest course is always to get permission from the copyright
owner before using copyrighted material. The Copyright Office
cannot give this permission.
When it is impracticable to obtain permission, use of copyrighted
material should be avoided unless the doctrine of fair use would
clearly apply to the situation. The Copyright Office can neither
determine if a certain use may be considered fair nor advise on
possible copyright violations. If there is any doubt, it is
advisable to consult an attorney.
FL-102, Revised September 2010
� "Fair use is distinct from affirmative defences where a use
infringes a copyright, but there is no liability due to a valid
excuse, e.g., misuse of a copyright."
17 U.S.C. § 107
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17 U.S.C. § 106 and 17
U.S.C. § 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such
use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means
specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment,
news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom
use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of
copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any
particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall
the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is
of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational
the nature of the copyrighted work;
the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to
the copyrighted work as a whole; and
the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the
Fair Use Act Disclaimer
This site is for educational purposes only.